QQQ vs VTI: Side-by-Side ETF Comparison
Thinking about investing in QQQ or VTI? This side-by-side breakdown helps you decide between concentrated tech exposure and broad U.S. market diversification, based on performance, risk, and long-term potential.

Which one is better? QQQ delivers higher historical returns with a concentrated bet on tech and innovation, while VTI offers broad, diversified exposure to the entire U.S. stock market at a lower cost. Choose QQQ if you're seeking aggressive growth and can handle volatility; pick VTI for a balanced, long-term core holding.
Table of Content
ETF Issuers & Investment Objective
When comparing VTI vs QQQ, it’s essential to begin with the issuers and the core goals of each fund because they reflect two very different investment philosophies.
Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)
QQQ, introduced in March 1999 under the PowerShares brand (now Invesco), is one of the most recognizable ETFs on the market. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index, composed of the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. These are predominantly tech and growth-oriented names, making QQQ a concentrated bet on innovation, disruption, and digital transformation. With only 100 holdings and a higher fee (0.20 %), QQQ appeals to investors looking for mega-cap growth exposure, especially in sectors like technology, communication services, and consumer discretionary.
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI)
Launched in May 2001 by Vanguard, a pioneer of low-cost index investing, VTI was designed to give investors complete exposure to the U.S. equity market. The fund tracks the CRSP U.S. Total Market Index, covering over 3,000 stocks from large-cap giants to micro-cap startups. Vanguard employs a sampling method to mirror the index while maintaining efficiency and low turnover. With its ultra-low 0.03 % expense ratio, VTI serves as a cornerstone holding for long-term investors seeking broad diversification, low fees, and exposure to every corner of the U.S. economy.
In essence, VTI aims for total market representation, while QQQ targets market leadership and innovation. Your pick depends on whether you want breadth or concentrated growth in your equity allocation.
Annual & Cumulative Returns
Period | VTI | QQQ | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
YTD (2025) | -1.30% | -0.24% | -1.06% |
1-Year | +11.11% | +12.93% | -1.82% |
3-Year Returns | +14.52% | +20.98% | -6.46% |
5-Year Returns | +15.52% | +18.00% | -2.48% |
10-Year Returns | +11.86% | +17.43% | -5.57% |
When it comes to QQQ vs VTI, performance is where the gap truly widens. QQQ has consistently outpaced VTI across all major timeframes especially over 5- and 10-year periods thanks to its focus on high-growth technology giants. VTI’s more balanced exposure across the entire U.S. market tempers its returns but offers steadier performance across cycles. If maximizing long-term gains is the goal and you’re comfortable with volatility, QQQ has the upper hand.
Risk Metrics
Metric | VTI | QQQ |
1-Year Volatility | 12.17% | 13.91% |
3-Year Volatility | 16.84% | 20.13% |
3-Year Sharpe Ratio | 0.45 | 0.60 |
Returns aside, volatility plays a critical role in how each fund behaves. QQQ experiences wider price swings, which is expected from a portfolio packed with high-growth, often more speculative stocks. In contrast, VTI, with its thousands of holdings across sectors and market caps, tends to offer a smoother ride. For those weighing risk-adjusted returns in the context of a growth-vs-diversification approach, this contrast is a key decision point.
Explanation:
- Volatility reflects how much the price moves over time higher volatility means more frequent or larger price swings.
- Sharpe Ratio measures risk-adjusted returns: how much return you get for each unit of risk. Higher is better.
Dividend Yield & Growth
Metric | VTI | QQQ |
Dividend Yield | ~1.52% | ~0.90% |
Frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
VTI’s yield is notably higher, reflecting its inclusion of mature, dividend-paying companies across sectors like financials and consumer defensives. QQQ, on the other hand, leans into reinvestment-heavy growth names that typically offer lower yields. For investors looking for a blend of income and capital appreciation, the difference in payout profiles adds another layer to the broader diversification versus growth-focused debate.
Explanation:
- Dividend Yield is the percentage of the fund's current price that is paid out annually as dividends.
Fees & Liquidity
Metric | VTI | QQQ |
Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.20% |
Avg Bid-Ask Spread | ~0.01% | ~0.02% |
Avg Daily Volume (Est) | High | Very High |
Cost efficiency is a hallmark of VTI, making it especially appealing to long-term, buy-and-hold investors. While QQQ comes with a higher expense ratio, it offsets this with excellent liquidity and narrower spreads beneficial for active traders. This dynamic reflects the broader contrast between a cost-minimized, total-market approach and a more tactical, growth-tilted strategy.
Explanation:
- Expense Ratio is the annual fee taken by the fund manager, expressed as a % of your investment.
- Bid-Ask Spread is the difference between the buying and selling price. Smaller spreads mean lower transaction costs.
ETF Composition: Asset Classes
Asset Class | VTI (%) | QQQ (%) |
US Stocks | 98.89 | 96.57 |
Non-US Stocks | 0.56 | 3.36 |
Cash | 0.55 | 0.06 |
Bonds/Other | 0.00 | 0.00 |
One of the clearest distinctions lies in portfolio breadth. VTI holds thousands of companies across every market cap segment, offering true total market exposure. QQQ takes a much narrower view, concentrating on the largest non-financial names listed on the NASDAQ. For those balancing diversification against targeted exposure to leading growth stocks, this allocation structure becomes a defining characteristic.
Regional Allocation
Region | VTI (%) | QQQ (%) |
North America | 99.57 | 97.42 |
Europe Developed | 0.30 | 0.73 |
United Kingdom | 0.03 | 0.51 |
Other | <0.10 | <1.40 |
Both ETFs are heavily U.S.-centered, but QQQ includes a few internationally headquartered firms that trade on the NASDAQ, slightly increasing its global footprint. VTI remains almost entirely U.S.-based. While the regional difference is marginal, it subtly reinforces each fund’s underlying design one built for total U.S. exposure, the other more focused on global tech leadership.
Sector Weights
Sector | VTI (%) | QQQ (%) |
Technology | 30.13 | 52.44 |
Financial Services | 14.33 | 0.44 |
Consumer Cyclical | 10.36 | 13.53 |
Healthcare | 11.15 | 5.11 |
Communication Services | 8.74 | 15.75 |
Industrials | 8.86 | 3.65 |
Consumer Defensive | 5.82 | 5.61 |
Others (Energy, Real Estate, etc.) | ~10.61 | ~3.47 |
Sector distribution reveals the heart of the strategy behind each fund. QQQ leans strongly into technology, communication services, and consumer cyclicals sectors known for growth and innovation. VTI balances exposure across all sectors, including financials, industrials, and healthcare, dampening volatility but also limiting upside during tech-led rallies. This tradeoff is central to portfolio construction decisions that involve sector risk and reward.
Top 10 Holdings
Company | VTI (%) | QQQ (%) |
Apple | 5.94 | 7.76 |
Microsoft | 5.47 | 8.60 |
NVIDIA | 4.70 | 8.22 |
Amazon | 3.27 | 5.45 |
Meta | 2.24 | 3.56 |
Broadcom | 1.68 | 4.55 |
Tesla | 1.44 | 3.11 |
Alphabet A | 1.71 | 2.51 |
Berkshire B | 1.76 | 0.00 |
Alphabet C | 0.80 | 0.00 |
The concentration of top holdings in QQQ makes it highly sensitive to the performance of a few key players like Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Apple. In VTI, those same names appear but are balanced by thousands of smaller holdings, reducing single-stock impact. This contrast reflects broader portfolio philosophies one prioritizing precision and the other prioritizing broad-based risk management.
Valuation & Growth Metrics
Valuation Ratios
Metric | VTI | QQQ |
P/E Ratio (Forward) | 20.40 | 25.15 |
Price/Book | 3.66 | 6.31 |
Price/Sales | 2.42 | 4.86 |
Price/Cash Flow | 13.15 | 16.67 |
Dividend Yield | 1.52% | 0.90% |
Higher valuations in QQQ across earnings, sales, and book value are a function of its focus on high-growth names that trade at a premium. VTI’s valuations are more moderate, anchored by a mix of growth and value-oriented companies. These valuation levels give investors useful insight into where expectations are highest, and where potential reversion or upside may come from.
Explanation:
- P/E Ratio = Price divided by earnings. Indicates how expensive a fund is relative to profits.
- Price/Book = Price vs book value (assets minus liabilities).
- Price/Sales = Price relative to total revenue.
- Price/Cash Flow = Price relative to how much cash the companies generate.
Growth Expectations
Metric | VTI | QQQ |
Long-Term Earnings Growth | 10.01% | 8.78% |
Historical Earnings Growth | 7.93% | 13.84% |
Sales Growth | 6.92% | 8.81% |
Cash-Flow Growth | 6.26% | 12.62% |
Book-Value Growth | 7.10% | 11.02% |
Historical growth has clearly favored QQQ, thanks to outsized gains in revenue and cash flow among tech leaders. Yet forward-looking earnings estimates suggest VTI may catch up, as recovery in underrepresented sectors and smaller-cap names picks up. For investors deciding between growth concentration and full-market participation, this shifting dynamic is worth watching.
Which ETF Fits Your Portfolio - QQQ vs VTI?
Choosing between VTI and QQQ ultimately comes down to your investing style, time horizon, and risk appetite.
Choose QQQ if you want to lean into innovation and tech-driven growth. With concentrated exposure to the NASDAQ-100, QQQ is better suited for investors who are comfortable with higher volatility in exchange for higher potential returns. It shines during bull markets led by megacap tech, but requires a strong stomach during downturns.
Pick VTI if you're looking for broad, diversified exposure to the entire U.S. equity market including large-, mid-, small-, and micro-cap stocks across every sector. It’s ideal for long-term investors who want steady growth, lower volatility, and a hands-off, set-it-and-forget-it strategy. VTI also appeals to those seeking dividend income and cost efficiency thanks to its ultra-low expense ratio and balanced portfolio.
For most portfolios, these ETFs aren't mutually exclusive. Many investors use VTI as a core holding and complement it with QQQ to add a growth kicker. Whether you're building wealth gradually or trying to capture the next big tech wave, understanding how each ETF behaves will help you tailor your strategy to your financial goals.